🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, after a recent court ruling.

Appeals Court Agrees to Reconsider Legal Matter

The federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an larger group of 11 judges. The judicial body also overturned a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest turn in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the legal right and valid reason to send state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since the end of September when the deployment effort was started in response to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has claimed that federal officials at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have command of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, locals have been sharing footage of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city issued two legal injunctions this period – one blocking the federalization of the state troops, and another prohibiting the deployment of any national guard troops in the state, after attempts to circumvent the first order by calling up troops from California.

On the previous day, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, preventing the actual deployment of the forces.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under review together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This ruling shows that facts are important and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The founding document restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the president cannot dispatch the armed forces into American urban areas without cause. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this case progresses and our legal battle continues in the courts.”